Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Has coin grading gotten sloppy or more defined?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="pasasap2, post: 3660929, member: 57975"]I took an interest in coins many years ago. I remember being at a coin shop in the mall in Grand Forks, and looking at the many coins I wanted to buy and settling on the AG 1865 Indian Cent that filled the hole in my new Indian Cent folder. Yes, it was at the very beginning of collecting for me before I knew much about anything and I was barely old enough to buy the coin on my own. Well, back then I remember there was an ongoing discussion about what coins graded MS-65. The rules were that copper coins could not be toned, but silver coins could have some form of toning. The owner of the shop and a client were having a discussion about toning on MS-65 coins. The owner of the shop was charging a premium for blast white silver coins graded MS-65 or better. The argument was that he believed the toned silver coins were actually damaged and eventually would be considered a lower grade. The argument was because copper coins that are toned cannot be MS-65, then neither should silver coins. Toning was a form of oxidation or rust, and thus damage to the surface of the coin in his opinion. The client disagreed because he was collecting rainbow toning and thought toned silver should have a higher premium. At the time, copper coins had to be without toning to qualify as MS-65, else they had o be graded as MS-64. These days, I notice that even copper coins can be graded MS-65 with toning. So, the client won out in the end. You can buy a brown MS-65 penny if you want although mint red copper commands a higher premium. However, I wonder if grading has gotten a bit sloppy. Most MS-65 Red Lincoln Cents are spot free, and in the past, they had to be spot-free, but I am seeing a lot of MS-66 Red Lincoln Wheat Cents graded by PCGS with spots these days. Some of the spots are very distracting and make the coin ugly. I have even seen fingerprints on MS-65 coins, which is the past would have degraded a coin down to MS-63 or less. For toning, you really get a few different stages. White streeks are the most common early stages found on silver coins, and then comes more colors. Copper coins tend to start to brown and sometimes form bright rainbow toning quicker than silver coins. The next stages are unsightly damage, such as really black coloration or black carbon spots. If a person has touched a coin, it sometimes forms a permanent black fingerprint. The last group of toning types are ugly and, in the past, would have meant that a coin could not be graded above MS-63. Today, I see MS-65 coins with fingerprints and black carbon spots. So, is it the definitions of grading that have changed or has grading gotten sloppy?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="pasasap2, post: 3660929, member: 57975"]I took an interest in coins many years ago. I remember being at a coin shop in the mall in Grand Forks, and looking at the many coins I wanted to buy and settling on the AG 1865 Indian Cent that filled the hole in my new Indian Cent folder. Yes, it was at the very beginning of collecting for me before I knew much about anything and I was barely old enough to buy the coin on my own. Well, back then I remember there was an ongoing discussion about what coins graded MS-65. The rules were that copper coins could not be toned, but silver coins could have some form of toning. The owner of the shop and a client were having a discussion about toning on MS-65 coins. The owner of the shop was charging a premium for blast white silver coins graded MS-65 or better. The argument was that he believed the toned silver coins were actually damaged and eventually would be considered a lower grade. The argument was because copper coins that are toned cannot be MS-65, then neither should silver coins. Toning was a form of oxidation or rust, and thus damage to the surface of the coin in his opinion. The client disagreed because he was collecting rainbow toning and thought toned silver should have a higher premium. At the time, copper coins had to be without toning to qualify as MS-65, else they had o be graded as MS-64. These days, I notice that even copper coins can be graded MS-65 with toning. So, the client won out in the end. You can buy a brown MS-65 penny if you want although mint red copper commands a higher premium. However, I wonder if grading has gotten a bit sloppy. Most MS-65 Red Lincoln Cents are spot free, and in the past, they had to be spot-free, but I am seeing a lot of MS-66 Red Lincoln Wheat Cents graded by PCGS with spots these days. Some of the spots are very distracting and make the coin ugly. I have even seen fingerprints on MS-65 coins, which is the past would have degraded a coin down to MS-63 or less. For toning, you really get a few different stages. White streeks are the most common early stages found on silver coins, and then comes more colors. Copper coins tend to start to brown and sometimes form bright rainbow toning quicker than silver coins. The next stages are unsightly damage, such as really black coloration or black carbon spots. If a person has touched a coin, it sometimes forms a permanent black fingerprint. The last group of toning types are ugly and, in the past, would have meant that a coin could not be graded above MS-63. Today, I see MS-65 coins with fingerprints and black carbon spots. So, is it the definitions of grading that have changed or has grading gotten sloppy?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Has coin grading gotten sloppy or more defined?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...