Harpers Ferry DDR

MY PS I just want to say it seems like Mr. Gallego Question was addressed towards me. But thank you for answering a question that was addressed towards me.But it seems you didn't answer any of the gentlemen's questions. You just asked more questions. It seems to me he was interesting in solving problems he was having with the system that he already has. But I'm sure any help that any of us can give someone is appreciated.USMC60

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I found that to reduce glare instead of tilting camera in your hand to get the right angel, it is helpful to tilt the coin itself. if you haven't tried that.

 

if close ups are not an issue then why show a stack of quarters? why not show what varieties you found now instead of making people wait for Wexler's listings to post?

 

Not really waiting on Wexler. For someone who is been a member as long as you, you should know the answer to your question.A really famous quote and I forgot who said it. Always keep them wanting more. Right now I'm not comfortable with the photos I have. Trying to improve them. When I like what I'm seeing I will post the pics.

 

Yes, and is why I didn't answer his question, but responded to him WITH A QUESTION OF MY OWN.

Now, trying to keep this in mind, can you now grasp why I didn't answer his question directed towards you? I asked what I did so, if answered, I could tailor my response to his needs/wants or point him in the direction of someone more familiar with certain options than myself. This isn't about me or about you, but the gentleman who is seeking information.

That said, if you're truly "keep up to date" you should know there are near countless options available, none of which will perfectly fit anyone and everyone's needs, wants, or desires. If one simply wants to shoot a few very low quality detail shots to share with the forum, perhaps to show and/or identify possible varieties, and do so on the cheap, their options are not going to be the same as someone who, as an example, wishes to produce whole coin glamor shots of the highest possible quality. Perhaps the gentleman just wishes to sufficiently image a few coins every now and then, but is more interested in photography beyond just coins. I could go on and on, but again, if you're truly so up on things you should already know this. Unfortunately, many buy these inexpensive little USB "scopes" without understanding their limitations and/or what they really are. There's nothing wrong with choosing to use one, of course, but the gentleman made it rather clear he's not presently pleased with the results he's getting. Keeping this in mind, there's nothing wrong with simply asking what his needs/desires are in order to possibly present him with other options to look into. Quite simple, really.

My response to his post was very simple and absolutely sincere. I do NOT wish to endlessly argue nonsense with you, and is why I intentionally avoided responding to, countering, or saying anything directly to you.

 

This one is definitely not a doubled die sent it in had to be sure.
John A. Wexler Attribution 2016-P WV 25¢ with die deterioration doubling in the indicated area. It is not from a doubled die

 

Matthew not really happy with the photos but they'll have to do. This is the one I was telling you about.

 

Still working on photographing these but I think you'll like this one.

 

Photos are great. And now I have some work to do, going through a few uncirculated rolls of these I've had since they first came out. Were they pretty easy to see under minimal magnification?

 

I found most of them were easy to see from the straight on view. But be sure even if the ones you think may not have it, Be sure to go all around it in your observation. The same applies of course in the homesteads. I have found some that are real light. And they're the ones that do not come out well In photos with the equipment I have. Basically I just haven't found the right angle And the right lighting to show these light impression. Still working on more photos when I get the time.Thanks for your reply.

 

Another nice DD.

 

No, I did not think about it. I will try it over the weekend.

Thank you very much!

 

Thanks for the reply.

I am trying to get good photos of my Washington Quarters and Lincoln Cents. The Quarters are ok, not the greatest, but ok. The Cents, come off quite off color, they appear purplish if I use a white background (which come out bluish and purplish instead of white). If I use a black background, pinkish.

The best I can so is to show it with actual photos. I will upload them on Monday. I will try titling them as bryantallard is suggesting.

The USB scope I have is a Celestron Digital Microscope and it does automatically the white balance.

Thank you very much, to both of you.

 

Just a suggestion. I'm basically using the same type of digital microscope that you're using. And if found a lot of the limitations on how the photo looks. One thing I don't like doing is going to my paint program and adding the filters to the photo in some cases it helps. But not desired on my part. I preferred the natural look of the coin if possible I have also had that problem with trying to photograph cents. The last time I was at Kmart went over to the school supply section pick me up a pack of variety colored sheets I believe we used to call it craft paper. So I could try photographing with different colors backgrounds. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. At least with my USB scope I have found the right light you can achieve the photo that you want. I have tried other lighting systems that members have suggested but I found most of them are working with a different photographing system. In does not apply to these USB cameras. Basically all I can recommend is what I do. I try all kinds of lighting techniques. But truthfully sometimes the simplest can be the best. And I'll show a photo of mine lighting system that works quite well not all the time but sometimes.USMC60

 

Thank you very much USMC60.

I was planning on testing this weekend the suggestions you guys have given me but I was really tired after my first having my first table at coin show on Saturday.

There are still four Kmart's in San Diego, I will try to visit two of them this afternoon and look for one of those lights and play around with the suggestions I got.

Thanks again.

 

If your main goal is to image the entire coin, your best bet would be an actual camera. This doesn't automatically mean you'd need to run out and spend a bunch of money to buy one though; fine results can be had using a number of phone cameras, and many use common and inexpensive P&S (point and shoot) cameras with excellent results, so if you already have one, it may be in your best interest to give it a try. If not, you may be able to pick up an older model for next to nothing. I'm trying to remember who has written of this and has made recommendations in the past - perhaps @Lehigh96 or @messydesk - but all depends on if you're willing to take another route.

Unfortunately, usb "microscopes", while they have a place and can fill a need, aren't ideal tools for imaging entire coins. @desertgem has, if I recall correctly, written of their limitations and nicely explained their pros and cons. Perhaps he'll be so kind as to offer some additional insight here.

As for lighting, instead of getting something rather unknown, perhaps look into Jansjo from IKEA (or Amazon or...?). They're inexpensive and many seem to love them. Perhaps @green18 could share his experiences with you.

 

Thanks @BooksB4Coins

Another good suggestion, I have a phone camera that takes good pictures but not tried to use as a coin camera. I would not mind putting the USB microscope in storage

I will look for postings from @desertgem.

There was a great USB microscope for sale at the 2016 World's Fair of Money in Anaheim. The coins look great and the software was meant for coin collectors. Unfortunately, I was not able to find their card or remember their company name.

Thanks!

 

I don't know I do not have a hard time taking full shots of coins This shot is from a USB camera and the gold quarter is encapsulated. For What I paid for the camera this is good enough for me. Don't get me wrong I had another USB camera that had more megapixels and no matter what tricks I tried I could not get it to take a good photo. Went back to my old lower megapixel camera started perfecting my lighting and this is what you can accomplish with a $15 USB camera. Maybe your camera will never work right for you and you may have to move on. But it's only my opinion this is a pretty good photo for a cheap USB camera.

 

Jansco's are terrific when it comes to lighting. Like 'Books' said above, they're reasonably priced for the job that they do. I've got to get one more (I have two already) and try a three light setup.

Prior to the Jansco's I used two Verilux desk lamps. These types of lamps are what is known as 'true light' lamps......they're just like sunlight. The Jansco's are tungsten, so no mater which way you go, make sure you adjust your white balance accordingly.

 

Much appreciated. Thanks for taking the time to respond and, of course, for your insight.