Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tanso, post: 3544468, member: 78944&quot;]It is a pity that I missed this very interesting post. I contacted <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/idesofmarch01.39084/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/idesofmarch01.39084/"><b>IdesOfMarch01</b></a> to warn him that his coin probably was not a fake in my opinion, but of course I can not assure that without checking it in my hands. The biggest mistake is to consider that Coin 2 is from the same dyes than the others, which is not correct. The dyes are very close but not exactly the same. In fact, Amentia showed a coin (supposed to be authentic and sold in the same Auction House, NAC) with the same dyes (same S and A) of the Coin 2, both coins look authentic. There is a third coin of the same dyes in the Museum of London, which it is supposed to be authentic too.</p><p><br /></p><p>Coin 1 has a long pedigree that you can check in the last auction of this month:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=5927&amp;category=197776&amp;lot=4948794" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=5927&amp;category=197776&amp;lot=4948794" rel="nofollow">https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=5927&amp;category=197776&amp;lot=4948794</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>So, in principle, there is no doubt that Coin 1 is authentic, the strange appearance can be due to pasted or old dyes.</p><p><br /></p><p>According to my database, in my opinion there is not any fake yet, and hopefully never. Well, there is a replica but of very low quality.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in