Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;oval_man, post: 1710474, member: 22602&quot;]My intention was not to &quot;attack&quot; you but to challenge your rash assumption, as did others, that the attendant in question is <i>obviously</i> lazy because he refused to give change. We suggested not to jump to conclusions. <i>You</i> made the thread personal (i.e., departing from the info in the OP) by going on about how hard you work and about the plight of your &quot;forefathers.&quot; I stand by what I said in my initial post: your assumptions are based on the barest of info and infused with resentment—toward some faceless, abstract &quot;other&quot; who doesn&#039;t work as hard as you do.</p><p><br /></p><p>Mine is not a &quot;fantasy&quot; defense; I did not once during this thread mount a defense. And my <i>ad hominem</i> comments followed yours, <i>quid pro quo</i> (something about &quot;orifices&quot;).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I just read through again the first few pages of this post, before our exchanges, and have no idea what you do.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in