No, it isn't possible. The zinc plate sits in a table that spins the plate at a high rate of speed. The die is held in something like a drill press and lowered down to the spinning plate. You ever tried to hold a piece of metal against a grinding wheel by hand ? It can't be done, not without bracing the metal against the edge of the gaurd anyway. Dies are not held by hand and polished. It's a machine.
OK, now look closely at those lines. The only reason they exist in that placement is because those portions of the devices are so shallow to begin with that they nearly meet the level of the fields. And with sufficient polishing, they do in fact meet the level of the fields. That's why the lines only show up right there and not any place else on the wing.
As best I can make out, the lines you reference on the 12-S are in the same position (relative to the device) as those lines are on the 22-D. The original red makes the nose and forehead look larger than they really are.
I was under the impression that it was worn dies that caused those lines. Not sure where I got that from but here's another example.
As seen side by side - as I said, no comparison. In the one image the lines stop at the edge of the device, in the other they are clearly on the device.
Those are flow lines that were not polished out, Different cause, different thing entirely. But they do look similar.
Doug is right! It is impossible for die polishing lines to show up in the devices. It's possible that you might be confusing die polishing with die cleaning. Sometimes, it is necessary to use a wire brush to clean out debris and grease that accumulates in the devices, but these would be scratches or gouges on the surface of the devices. Here is an example of scratches/gouges that resulted from cleaning. Chris
Or - those are not the result of cleaning a die with a wire brush, but instead the result of flow lines from very worn die. Personally, I have never heard of a wire brush being used to clean a die. Nor can I imagine that anyone would do so precisely because of the resulting damage to the die. Mint workers tended to be very careful with coin dies because of the expense of making them. If the marks on rlm's coin were on the rest of the devices instead of just on the edges of the devices then I could agree that they were the result of flow lines. But since they only appear on the edges of the devices, I think my idea of the coin being whizzed a long time ago and then toning afterwards and wiping out traces of the whizzing in the fields is much more likely. But I freely admit, I can't prove it.
i have to admit i am clueless on the grade. if i had to guess i suppose AU58 but 0 confidence in that. what's the answer?
That went so well, I think I will try a couple more. A penny grading contest? And mine wil all be pennies. Anyway, the 12-S was 62RB. The coin has more red in hand than the pictures show, but it is still a push IMHO.
Glad someone has lots! Wouldn't take me long to exhaust all 6 of my slabbed cents. Point me in the direction of a thread on how to photograph them through the plastic and I'll give it a whirl though.
Wow, I was way off. I went from Guess the grade 3 to 2 to 1. I guess I should go the right way next time. LOL