Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 1584386, member: 37839&quot;]I am not personally criticizing you--you posted on a &quot;what do you think of the grade&quot; thread, and didn&#039;t like the response you got.&nbsp; Too bad for that--don&#039;t post on a thread like that if you&#039;re too thin-skinned to deal with the responses.&nbsp;&nbsp; I reiterate that it is a A) business strike that has been extensively buffed.&nbsp; B) cleaned and dipped, and not gently.&nbsp; C) was graded generously by NGC.&nbsp; D) will most likely be a details coin from PCGS.&nbsp; Haven&#039;t changed my mind--the coin has been extensively worked on to make it look like that--most older proofs do NOT.&nbsp; I gave the example of the PR 65, as it shows a coin with the patina common to that type and that date--that coin is a much nicer coin than the one you posted, but the contrast and strike is consistent with a proof.&nbsp; Yours is consistent with being doctored.&nbsp;&nbsp; Sorry, but you don&#039;t like that, don&#039;t ask for opinions.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in