Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;treylxapi47, post: 1869778, member: 41863&quot;]Well, the luster is there and it is nice, but it is also muted. So very good eye to picking up on that.</p><p><br /></p><p>With that said, the Type 1 SLQ&#039;s exhibited a mostly satin surface and luster, so I am wondering if that may be the case here. Bowers mentions it in one of his books about the issue of these having that satiny luster and I am wondering if thats the problem with this coins luster versus a similar coin that has been dipped. Of course I have no way of knowing for sure, but I agree with this coin as a 63 borderline 64. </p><p><br /></p><p>After a few more guesses I will reveal the grade, which will probably make everyone go &#039;huh?!?&#039;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in