Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;micbraun, post: 2718671, member: 54036&quot;]Correct, pictures can be deceptive. Looking at the reverse of the second 81-S however, it&#039;s obvious that it was either weakly struck or there&#039;s some wear. Apparently it is a weak strike (if we trust PCGS and the assigned MS grade) but I really don&#039;t see an MS65 coin... in market grading we should not only look at the surface preservation, but also at strike, luster and eye appeal. I don&#039;t want to judge luster from pictures, but the strike is weak, which alone should prevent such a high grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in