Guess the grade part 3-King odf rupees

Another beautiful coin Spock , by the pictures I'll say MS-64
rzage:hatch::hammer:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

maybe all ypur coins are cleaned only you can answer that. talk to the guy who wrote up the catalog its a cleaned example. If you think you know more than Randy Weir then i have nothing to say. Ill tell you how Kruase gets their pricing from dealers. Its not greysheet and you cant speak from both sides of the mouth their pricinf is either right or wrong it cant be both for the same coin.

This site is not about debates for me. you can carry on with whatever you want to do but i am not part of it and wont be. Condescending statements with me will only get you on the ignore list nowhere else. I have already told you about the 1939 rupee i have nothing more to add believe what you want. Why do some coins get hoarded and others not is a question you can answer too.

 

thank you Rusty its time we got back to the purpose of the thread

 

If you spoke to Randy Weir and he told you it is a cleaned example then it is a different story, but the auction description does not state that.

http://sixbid.com/nav.php?p=viewlot&sid=39&lot=841

"COINS OF BRITISH INDIA, Colonial and Regal, Rupee, 1897C (KM 492; Pr 136). Some marks, otherwise uncirculated. the lowest mintage of this whole series"

If you are pained on being your misleading statements exposed then please go ahead and put me on your ignore list. Nowhere have you been objective and just throwing statements. I would cease debating with you since you think you are always right! Remember your condescending statement to me in the 1840 Rupee link where you claimed you had 20 years of experience and had positively identified the coin (judging by what the TPG and dealer said).... did it not turn out to be not the one in question?? come on no harm in admitting spock can be wrong, but this is your image on this blog so be it. Best of luck.

 

look mr holier than thou you are wasting your time the coin has not been identified as yet and it certainly wont be until I get ballabh's response and no matter what you think you are not better at indian coins then the dealer who sold this. i know it hurts but its the reality so grin and bear it. as i told you before i dont need to claim anything and it will be a great thing if you stopped debating as i have told you countless times before i am not at all interested in debating with anyone and that includes you. Perhaps you will get the idea this time best of luck to you. you are the one who needs it as being jealous of my image on this forum wont get you anywhere.

Furthermore this is not the subject of this thread please dont hijack this thread with your twisted cut copy and paste. thanks.

 

thanks eddie. If i am able to excite anyone with any of my coins than their purpose is served. Unfortunately some get excited the wrong way thankfully we have a technological solution

 

Not jealous but just ****ed off with your false statements. You are implying that Mr. Randy Weir wither acted unethically by not mentioning the cleaning in the auction catalog and so misled the bidders to put in a high bid.

Why can't you clear up this statement of yours? We can then all avoid Mr. Weir in the future.

Is it too much to ask just to clarify your statement? I have asked this to you two posts and you just responded with some garbage.

Please give a specific answer to this now or else we would know that you are just shooting words as they come.

 

looks like the filter works thank god for technology now if we had one in real life too