Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 3220208, member: 15309&quot;]Actually, baseball21 has a point here.&nbsp; If the original photo was the PCGS Truview as opposed to the GC photo, I would bet you that the guesses all would have been much higher.&nbsp; I guessed MS63 with a 1 point bump for color because of the GC photo.&nbsp; Based on the TruView, I would have have graded the coin MS65 with a 1 point bump for color.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Then you add into the equation that PCGS graded it MS65 and it has CAC approval at MS65, then yes, I would absolutely want to see the coin in hand before deciding which photo gives a more accurate representation of the coin&#039;s surfaces.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would lean towards GC photos being more accurate because in my experience, PCGS TruViews are basically like coin porn for the submitter and almost always show the coin in its best possible light.&nbsp; That said, the TruView has me questioning my original grade and seriously considering that this coin is not as grossly overgraded as everyone thought, including myself.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in