Guess the grade #62

This is a another that is easily a 65+ (66?). Problem is that the reverse has a bunch of the luster missing. Not sure what caused it, but that dark spot has teh luster and the rest does not. I rather like the obverse. I guess what I am saying is that 65 is about right.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

ddoomm1 lost his lead. It is that close so a couple of points make that big a difference. BTW, I did change ddoomm1's 67 to a 66.

Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses.

1. bahabully 0.273 24
2. ddoomm1 0.313 17
3. ldhair 0.333 10
4. BadThad 0.364 24
5. mark_h 0.381 23
6. Leadfoot 0.450 22
7. Duke Kavanaugh 0.455 24
8. swhuck 0.600 22
9. tmoneyeagles 0.800 16
10. Anarchos 0.846 14

 

Thanks Dick!

 

I'm falling!!!!

 

p.s. photo got me on this one -- first set of photos dont' show luster well at all. Second ones do. I'm blaming RLM.

 

Actually, a distant slab pic minus the grade would probably be helpful. I would have bumped my grade to a 65 after seeing the slab pic. It's just too easy to micro-grade with good, close-up pictures.