Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 979432, member: 2972&quot;]With all due respect you didn&#039;t suggest I go back and look, you said:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Which, frankly, I took as an insult.&nbsp; I do look closely -- and my results on these little threads confirms I look more closely than most.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now that you questioned me I will go back through each and every coin posted by RLM to find a better strike in O in ONE -- but will have to do it tonight, as I gotta get some work done today.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And, No, I don&#039;t remember grading in 1987 -- I was chasing 17 year old women not coins at the time.&nbsp; However, I have heard of the changing standards, and I believe you (and others) when they tell me about them.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lastly, please don&#039;t get confused between understanding how the TPGs grade and subscribing to or making excuses for those grades.&nbsp; When did I ever say I agreed with their grades?&nbsp; To the contrary, I find myself grading coins with these planchet marks lower than the TPG myself.&nbsp; That doesn&#039;t change their opinion, my opinion, or your opinion -- other than to note they are different.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in