Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rlm&#039;s cents, post: 1757926, member: 7957&quot;]Interesting coin, to put it mildly.&nbsp; I thought it would be genuine corroded and Doug thought it deserved a 67 - yeah, that Doug.&nbsp; There is nothing wrong with the strike and there are very few tiny nicks.&nbsp; Most of the coin has some great luster, but some of it has a sort of haze over it..&nbsp; The worst of that is the album toning on the reverse so it photographed&nbsp; as though it had the luster.&nbsp; BTW, those gray or blue areas actually have real nice luster and are not corrosion.&nbsp; I have no idea what they thought of the eye appeal.&nbsp; Anyhow, for all of this, NGC said genuine - altered color.&nbsp; I really don&#039;t get it.&nbsp; I have no idea how you could alter the color to look like that.&nbsp; Further comment welcomed.&nbsp; If I were to grade it, that is at least a 65+ and probably a 66.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[ATTACH=full]277683[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in