Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mark T, post: 866191, member: 20061&quot;]<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Lead - the coin is in my safe deposit box .</font></font></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">The reason I posted the two pictures was because the PCGS picture showed the luster better then my dull picture. It is a nice coin with great eye appeal and nice luster under the tone. The surface of the coin is very smooth for a MS 62 . </font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Notice the coins I brought up for guess the grade were all CAC certified. Forget ANA VS TPG grading standards for a minute and think about this.</font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Some people here are calling these CAC certified coins over graded by 5 to 6 grades. That Quarter Eagle AU 53 ??? This coin Au 50 ?? One guy went as far as calling this coin thumbed. This is ridiculous , conservative grading is best but some people here think they can grade better from a photo then John Albanese can with the coin in hand . Their grade assessment holds about as much water as a spaghetti strainer.</font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in