Not really Mike because the TPGs claim that they do not net grade. A net grade equals an average grade of the coin when the obv and rev grade differently. And the ANA guide definitively states that net grading is not accepted in the market.
But Doug , how often do the tpgs follow ANA grading , now they never do . Wish they gave an example with a higher obverse than reverse but they don't . But if they don't why did they write the obverse gets most of the weight of the grade . They probably wrote it the way they did , to give themselves leeway when market grading a coin .
Yes, these will end tonight, but I will not be entering another for a bit unless someone want to fix my water heater and breaker for me. Don't know when I will be back up.
Sorry to hear that Dick , owning a house is a never ending battle . Take your time , we'll all still be here .
I'm not saying the TPGs do follow the ANA book Rusty. Read what I said previously - Do you not understand what that means ? If you don't, let me put it a different way. What it is saying is this - The rules and standards listed in this book are the rules and standards used and followed by NGC and PCGS. And one of those rules is - "In reality, the 'market grade' of a coin is the lower of the two grades of its sides." Because the obv is the side of the coin that most often will show contact marks, hairlines, scratches, breaks in the luster, etc etc. The obv is the side with the large open spaces like the fields in front of and behind the central figure, flat smooth areas like the cheek and the neck. It is these areas that will most easily show everything detrimental that a coin can have. While the rev of the coin is often too busy with design features that hide or disguise the bad things. That's why they say the obv is the most important side.
I think I should manage to get the new set listed, but you will likely have to wait for the standing.
When you put it like that it makes more sence , but somewhere it says they market grade coins too . So they sure gave themselves plenty of leeway either way , great for the tpgs , not so great for the collector . But even with their ever loosening standards it's still better than it was pre tpgs .
Rusty, the ANA invented market grading. The ANA grading standards ARE market grading. The TPGs merely copied the ANA regarding that.
Then I misunderstood what market grading is . I thought market grading was a more loose standard of grading , like letting cabinet rub on MS coins , guess it's time to reread both the ANA prefecaces and PCGS's .
Rusty this line is a direct quote from the ANA grading standards book - "In reality, the 'market grade' of a coin is the lower of the two grades of its sides." And yes, most people do misunderstand what market grading is.
You make a good point that we are better off with the TPGs. But that doesn't mean they can't stand a little scrutteny No - this Penny is definitely an VF45. Ruben
55-S Great strike and luster, but there are nicks on Abe's lapel, in front of his nose, and a bunch of chatter above the "ONE". Nothing major, but it is all still there. I am pretty sure that is why NGC only called this a 66. There are definitely more and more obvious nick on this coin than the 42- so I agree with a 66 - of maybe a 66+.
No one is moving much lately. Good? Bad? I don't know, but this round, only BadThad and ddoomm1 flip flopped. No other changes. Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses. ldhair 0.357 30 BadThad 0.405 44 ddoomm1 0.409 24 Leadfoot 0.476 44 Shoewrecky 0.512 43 jcakcoin 0.543 48 rzage 0.571 37 mark_h 0.591 46 swhuck 0.605 40 Cazkaboom 0.646 50
I was fighting with 66 only because of the right, reverse fields, a pretty good hit, some spots and a hit above E. There's a good size hit in the O but the other stuff around the O doesn't bother me as much because that's a strike issue. It has killer luster and I thought NGC might slide it as they're welll known to do.