Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mark T, post: 865345, member: 20061&quot;]<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">All things created equal , I will take the opinion of John Albanese over pretty much anyone.&nbsp; I wonder if this thread is going to morph into a people who like CAC and those who don’t.&nbsp; We can discuss and argue about this coin until the cows come home. The key and I am sure Doug will say this as well , his opinion on the coin is based on my photo. </font></font><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">If the coin was sitting in front of him he would not grade it AU. CAC certified it as MS 64 . One reason CAC was formed was to weed out the properly graded coins from those that are not. Will anyone here say that CAC does not adhere to strict ANA standards of grading ? I am not a novice collector and you know me from the NGC boards. I will admit I am not at the level of someone such as Doug when it comes to grading, but I usually come very close when grading a coin. </font></font></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in