Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 917502, member: 15309&quot;]<img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%20Full%20Steps/JeffersonNickel1974BUObverse.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%20Misc/JeffersonNickel1968-SMS64Obverse.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>This the reason I don&#039;t believe you!&nbsp; It is obvious that the one mark is larger than the rest on the 1974.&nbsp; If you were claiming that the one single larger mark was a scoop shovel mark, your argument might have validity.&nbsp; But you are not.&nbsp; You are saying that all of the marks are scoop shovel marks.&nbsp; It seems very obvious to me that they are bag marks.&nbsp; In addition, I posted a similar looking graded MS64 1968-S nickel which you ignored completely.&nbsp; Both coins are shown above.</p><p><br /></p><p>You are pulling out the wildest scenario possible to explain something that is so common and simple.&nbsp; These two coins either have ordinary everyday bag marks or each was so unlucky as to be brutalized by a scoop shovel and then both won the lottery by escaping detection by PCGS graders ending up with MS65 &amp; MS64 grades respectively.&nbsp; IMO, your explanation is tantamount to a coin grading conspiracy theory.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in