Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 1636307, member: 4626&quot;]What year is that?&nbsp; And looks to be about as much chest detail as the OP&#039;s coin as far as I can tell (but kind of hard to tell because of the smaller picture).</p><p><br /></p><p>Well not sure how picky NGC is these days.&nbsp; But I still think it&#039;s a 65 at least (and I&#039;ve seen many 65&#039;s that look a lot worse.&nbsp; It may not be quite as fully struck as the ebay coin, but it has a lot less marks than I&#039;ve seen on a lot of Washington quarters that only got a 65, so I still think a 66 is possible.&nbsp; I own a PCGS-graded quarter that got a 65 that looks way worse than the OP&#039;s coin).</p><p><br /></p><p>But then who knows, could depend on what the grader has for breakfast that day.&nbsp; Even the best TPGs aren&#039;t perfectly consistent.&nbsp; Less marks but weaker strike, is that a wash or does having fewer marks make it better?&nbsp; I know what my opinion is, and what yours is, but wouldn&#039;t hazard a guess at what the grader&#039;s opinion will be.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in