Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 487199, member: 4920&quot;]Mike and Doug, I know. But I&#039;m saying Zaneman can&#039;t do that to any practical degree of precision. I wish he could. For that matter, I wish we all could. I wish I could precisely explain why I think it&#039;s NT. But we can&#039;t even define what we mean by AT and NT, outside of just in the abstract (which is of course of no practical use to anybody), when you get right down to it. And, because of that, I think it&#039;s a little premature to be asking why it&#039;s AT, when we can&#039;t even agree on a definition of AT.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>EDIT</b>: BTW, I agree with what you&#039;re saying, Mike, on the need to press for specifics, so as to enhance our knowledge and understanding. What about starting with defining these terms, first, though, specifically...that&#039;s what I&#039;m saying.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in