Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mikenoodle, post: 487132, member: 307&quot;]I would disagree on the AT call. The toning may be ugly, but plausibly could naturally occur in this way. I also say that toning also does a phenomenal job of hiding things, so grading a toned coin like this from a picture might be nearly impossible to do with any accuracy, well at least for me.</p><p><br /></p><p>If pressed, I would say AU-55 because I think the strike is relatively weak, especially for a 1922, and there may be just a hint of wear hiding on the highest points and underneath the toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>just my 2¢,</p><p><br /></p><p>mikenoodle[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in