Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;illini420, post: 693894, member: 19423&quot;]Exactly, that was part of the reason I posted these.&nbsp; Very hard to call it based on photos alone.&nbsp; From the photo of the 1893 I&#039;d say MS63 max, especially of how the lighting caught that big hit in the obverse field.&nbsp; But in hand the color and the prooflike shine is just so cool that you hardly notice that hit.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The 1892 is really a gem that looks like many 66s I&#039;ve seen based on luster and eye appeal.&nbsp; I&#039;m guessing the remnants of the prints on the obverse is holding it back just a bit, but I love it <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in