Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bahabully, post: 1072766, member: 17555&quot;]your right leadfoot,, you can&#039;t learn to grade by reading a book anymore than you can learn to teardown and rebuild an engine by reading a book... the doing of it is what teaches everyone. I&#039;m just pointing out that the book and the actual are very poorly aligned.... you watch this baby come in MS63, or if it doesn&#039;t then i can post or point to 5 others that look like it that are graded by one of the big 3 in ms63,,, and don&#039;t even get me started on the 22d&#039;s !! in any case, my gripe is the application of grading rules to some dates and then the way the tpg&#039;s provide a completely different grading delimiters to other dates within a series if a specific date has strike issues, or luster issues, etc....&nbsp; these date specific issues should not warrent a different standard. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If it were up to me there wouldn&#039;t be a single 22d weak reverse in MS anywhere,, yes, even it just came off the press. imo, the strike would hold it down per the ana grading standards and we&#039;d all be looking for red vf35 and ef40 22d weak strikes to complete our BU set of cents.... and they would be priced accordingly.....</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>breaking the standard just opens the door,, and the door be a swinging freely folks.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in