Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rlm&#039;s cents, post: 1025878, member: 7957&quot;]I probably should not have posted these pix.&nbsp; I really cannot see the &quot;wear&quot; that appears in the pix - unless and until I put it under a bright light.&nbsp; It actually looks like it has nice luster for a brown coin with no evidence of any breaks.&nbsp; As for the grading, I can understand why some called it AU and I can understand 63 (and a 64), but how did so many come up with the others?&nbsp; The coin has minimal marks and shows some luster.&nbsp; That has got to be AU or 63 or higher.&nbsp; Since PCGS grades with a smaller light, they called it a 64.&nbsp; So when I said at lest one got it right, it was just one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in