Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Sean5150, post: 2332308, member: 75607&quot;]Alright, I couldn&#039;t wait any more. What&#039;s even crazier is I sent in both 84s to be VAM 2 attributed. I would send it back, but how much money can you throw away? My personal opinion is the 65 cutoff is very difficult to guess. But I think they got it wrong with these coins. Coin 1 doesn&#039;t photograph well, but the surfaces are smooth. Coin 2 looks just as good. Coin 3 IMO was a 64+. So is it inconsistency, or are there characteristics I&#039;m just not taking into account? But the VAM 2 thing ticked me off. I sent in three 84s, so it&#039;s possible either I or they didn&#039;t note the right one to look at, but that VAM is so easy to spot wouldn&#039;t they just say &quot;Oh he meant this one&quot;? (Don&#039;t ask me why I would even waste money on attribution, I just think it&#039;s cool)</p><p><br /></p><p>The photos I take tend to show the coin in the most negative light. But I take them the same way every time, so it shouldn&#039;t be a factor.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]472950[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]472951[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]472952[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in