GTG Saint Gaudens

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Rheingold, Aug 16, 2019.

?

Possible grade?

  1. AU50

    6 vote(s)
    10.3%
  2. AU53

    2 vote(s)
    3.4%
  3. AU55

    5 vote(s)
    8.6%
  4. AU58

    11 vote(s)
    19.0%
  5. MS60

    4 vote(s)
    6.9%
  6. MS61

    9 vote(s)
    15.5%
  7. MS62

    14 vote(s)
    24.1%
  8. MS63

    5 vote(s)
    8.6%
  9. MS64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. AUdetails

    2 vote(s)
    3.4%
  1. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I went with MS-62.

    If the coin was AU, I'd expect to see the luster disturbed in the fields. I see full luster in the fields, especially on the reverse, so I went with an UNC grade. Lot's of marks so its not a high grade, but I don't see anything I'd definitively call wear.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Ok, thanks for your input...you are right.
    So just one more day.
     
  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  5. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Doug is it you?
     
    Johndoe2000$ and -jeffB like this.
  6. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The pictures make it difficult to determine how much luster is there. If it is all there and the coin is just weakly-struck, MS-62. Otherwise, AU-55/58.
     
  7. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    @Rheingold $20 it’s a 62... the Saint would do it :p
     
    Seattlite86 and Rheingold like this.
  8. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    So guys, thanks for your guesses.
    Most of you voted MS61/MS62, so I do.
    Actually the coin resides in an OGH.....
    20190809_122301~3.jpg

    ..and I ask myself: Should I send the coin to PCGS for a regrade or leave the coin in the old holder?
    Maybe would CAC be an option?
    What do you think?
    Thanks.
     
  9. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    If it were mine, I'd try for a CAC gold sticker first, to preserve the old holder. Even if it jumped to AU58 when regraded, it's not worth much more, if any. But in MS, there's a significant jump in value. Honestly though, if you crack it and don't get an UNC, you wasted your time and money, IMO.
     
  10. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    I agree with @C-B-D , but I personally think the coin is AU. :p
     
    C-B-D and Rheingold like this.
  11. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I also graded it AU53... pretty low, contrary to my usual guesses.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I like it in the old holder and agree with going for the CAC gold.
     
  13. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd Supporter

    +1
     
    Seattlite86 and Rheingold like this.
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I wouldn't dream of making any recommendations without seeing the coin in-hand.

    Actually, I wouldn't dream of it even after seeing the coin in-hand, because I'm still near the beginning of the learning curve on these. But it's definitely silly to make an AU/MS call without closely inspecting the luster flow over the high points, and that requires moving light.
     
  15. GoldBug999

    GoldBug999 Well-Known Member

    I also recommend "going for the gold" CAC sticker.
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  16. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Send to cac. I’d never in a million years crack it out of that old holder
     
    GoldFinger1969 and Rheingold like this.
  17. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Let us know what you do, Rheingold.....

    BTW, did you like the beer ? I remember when they dominated the NYC beer market. Miss Rheingold.....etc. :D
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  18. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    @GoldFinger1969

    Until now, nothing:confused:
    I live in Germany, where CAC is currently not available.:(
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  19. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    keep it in the OGH, trying for a bean seems reasonable, given the low up front cost. I guessed low AU, it's always tough to guess field luster from static photos. But I felt it definitely AU for what was (to me) obvious rub on the high points.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Ship to someone stateside and have them submit it. I can do that if you need
     
    Rheingold likes this.
  21. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page