Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG(s) a study in strike vs wear?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TypeCoin971793, post: 4611917, member: 78244"]This is where you are wrong and deluding yourself. It is a measure of the coin’s state of preservation. Nothing more, and nothing less. The TPGs are bending the rules a little bit to adjust the coin’s grade to be commensurate with the “value” they think it should have.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Is it though? A fully-stuck and well-centered Athens tet will always sell for more than a weakly-stuck example that is halfway off the flan, even if they are both Mint State. It isn’t a fool’s notion. It’s how the market has always been.</p><p><br /></p><p>I’m sure exceptions can be made for those who pursue numbers, but it is safe to assume that they have no idea what they are doing and thus don’t count.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Sounds like you are the one that can’t get the market’s indoctrination out of your head. There is no reason that a lower grade can’t be worth more than a higher grade. Coins graded AU-58+ routinely sell for MS-61/62 money.</p><p><br /></p><p>That’s why I am a proponent of a 60-70 system for coins with circulation wear/cabinet friction. So you can have an amazing coin with a touch of wear that grades AU-65, and it will be worth more than the “UNCs” graded MS-60 to 62. Mindsets are already shifting this way.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is so incorrect that it is laughable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TypeCoin971793, post: 4611917, member: 78244"]This is where you are wrong and deluding yourself. It is a measure of the coin’s state of preservation. Nothing more, and nothing less. The TPGs are bending the rules a little bit to adjust the coin’s grade to be commensurate with the “value” they think it should have. Is it though? A fully-stuck and well-centered Athens tet will always sell for more than a weakly-stuck example that is halfway off the flan, even if they are both Mint State. It isn’t a fool’s notion. It’s how the market has always been. I’m sure exceptions can be made for those who pursue numbers, but it is safe to assume that they have no idea what they are doing and thus don’t count. Sounds like you are the one that can’t get the market’s indoctrination out of your head. There is no reason that a lower grade can’t be worth more than a higher grade. Coins graded AU-58+ routinely sell for MS-61/62 money. That’s why I am a proponent of a 60-70 system for coins with circulation wear/cabinet friction. So you can have an amazing coin with a touch of wear that grades AU-65, and it will be worth more than the “UNCs” graded MS-60 to 62. Mindsets are already shifting this way. This is so incorrect that it is laughable.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG(s) a study in strike vs wear?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...