I'm on the fence between VF20 and -25, but voted 20 to err on the side of conservatism. Regardless of the technical grade, the toning makes that a very handsome coin indeed.
Oh, I just noticed this is a @CircCam post. Small wonder it's a coin with eye appeal far exceeding the grade.
XF40 and a large 8... O-103a off the top of my head. Y'all aren't taking strike into consideration. These were struck very early on using a fairly primitive method.
Wondered about that. Noticed Liberty's hair was pretty smushy. Still wouldn't have gone much over 25 in my estimation, though. I'm utterly clueless on Overton varieties, as was famously demonstrated when I was the cherrypick-ee in the 1806 O-129 discovery.
I need practice at grading US coins since I'm gearing up to sell the remaining dregs of my family's hoard (mainly junk silver... nothing as interesting as the OP coin) so I'll take a stab at it . Using PCGS's Photograde pictures, it looks like a VF25 to me.
Surprise!! I lurk all over the forum Beautiful coin, @CircCam. It will be interesting to see the TPG grade of this coin. I suspect I tend to grossly overgrade my family's junk silver and undergrade everyone else's coins .
And that’s why I grade these from the right wing (eagle’s left wing). That’s where the strike was almost always full. I see a significant amount of wear there. These early halves can have residual luster down to F levels. I’m at VF-30 for those two reasons
Taking strike into account, I think this is a VF-30. I would not be surprised by 35, but I don't think it makes 40. The little traces of luster help make this a very eye appealing coin!
Looks like cleaned or altered surfaces in the fields. I would expect to see a darker and more even patina on a VF example. I think it's a very attractive coin.