GTG on proof nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by longarm, Jan 10, 2022.

  1. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    No more than 65, but probably 64
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    PF 65. People are grading too high, given the haziness.
     
    Kentucky and expat like this.
  4. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

    PF66 - haze can be removed with a quick EZest dip.
     
  5. Joshua Lemons

    Joshua Lemons Well-Known Member Supporter

    Just commenting to see the reveal. But the reverse has some marks that I think knocked it below gem. But, those could be something else entirely because, as said before, lighting on coins can hide lots of things. But, I am terrible at grading mint state coins generally.
     
  6. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    PR 65 ...just a guess (proof and TrueView image make it a challenge to grade)
     
  7. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    PF65 (pulling the number out of a hat)
     
  8. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    A hat is better than where I pulled my number!
     
    JimsOkay, Santinidollar and Kentucky like this.
  9. longarm

    longarm Well-Known Member

    A lot of good guesses and 2 were right, I had thought it would get a 65 or maybe if I was lucky a 66, but it came back a PR67, the best grade out of the order.
     
  10. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Thought that was what MS70 is for...
     
    Razz likes this.
  11. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    PR64. Too many fly specs for me.
     
  12. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Bi-dam bam
     
  13. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

    That would work as well...
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  14. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    That is a lamination on the reverse correct?
     
  15. longarm

    longarm Well-Known Member

    That's what I thought, which is something you don't see much on proofs, but it was the 40's.
     
  16. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Having shopped for these coins at the FUN show, I'd say the slab grade is PR-67.

    This has attractive toning, but it's also got some spots. In the old days, spots mattered, but they don't seem to now.

    In the old days very cloudy toning on silver Proof coins mattered too. Now it doesn't. I saw some some pieces that were totally dulled out with the film that forms on the 1936-42 Proof coins from the mint sleeves in which the coins were shipped and stored. That didn't stop the grading services from giving those coins PR-66 and 67 grades.
     
    longarm likes this.
  17. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    When I built a proof registry Jefferson set a number of years ago, I avoided the dull 38-42 proofs that were in 66-67 slabs. Some could care less about the coin if it had a 66-67 grade. But I'd rather have a lustrous 65 than a dull higher graded proof.
     
  18. longarm

    longarm Well-Known Member

    All in all it was a pretty good deal, paid $700 for the set and just under $200 for shipping, insuring and grading.
     
    wxcoin likes this.
  19. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    One of the lesser ddr's 004
     
  20. Steve Shupe

    Steve Shupe Active Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page