GTG: My 4 coin voucher submission grades just posted..

Here is a GTG that just posted on PCGS for my 4 coin voucher submission.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I love the 1902 O. Looks well struck..........

 

All four are sharp!

 

I'll go with
MS 66 FB
MS 63
MS 64
MS 64

 

65
64
64
58 or 63

 

65
63
64
65

 

65 FB, 65, 64,65 plus

 

65FB
63
64
65

 

66 FB
65
65
65

 

PCGS? Well, based on my experience with the folks in Newport Beach this year...

UNC-Details - Environmental Damage. There's a fleck above Mercury's bust.
UNC-Details - Damage. Stuck with cracked dies.
UNC-Details - Cleaned. Or whizzed. You pick.
Counterfeit - No explanation, just a body bag. Submit it again - you may get a Details grade.

 

You come across like you're mad because you got some bad results on your own submission. There is no need to take it out on this submitter.

Chris

 

Not taking it out on him at all, just making light of the fact that a lot of us have had dismal luck at PCGS lately.

In all seriousness, those are all quite wonderful gem mint state coins, and all outside my comfort zone. MS65ish across the board, with no dimples on the Morgans - I prefer the standard strike myself anyways.

 

And I concur with the FSB camp. Well defined, and separated.

 

66 fb
65
64
64

 

I've had my issues with pcgs. Finally on my last submission they mostly got it right detailed a coin that deserved it I was hoping for a pass on they shot a bit low on a couple but otherwise was ok. I think they've been super tough lately tho

 

65FB
65
64
64+

 

In other words, you had no business saying what you did!

Chris

 

PCGS goes easier on voucher submissions... to make new customers happy and keep regular customers coming back. SO:
MS65FB
MS65
MS64
MS65+

 

Again, I wasn't commenting at all on the quality of the OP's coins - I was making a joke about how rough a few of us have had it at PCGS lately. The sarcasm was directed at the grader, not the gradee. A number of us have sent in coins that have gotten Details grades for questionable reasons.

As said before, the Justin has an awesome collection here.

 

I get it. But it's been said before: You can't read humor or tongue in cheek. You can't hear the person's voice when reading something, so sometimes intent, sarcasm, etc, is missed.