Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Anntron, post: 4502940, member: 109580&quot;]Hi @bragator2,</p><p><br /></p><p>In answer to your question; No, PCGS (and other posters) got it right, I was wrong. As a matter of course, I went through my research images of Franklin Proofs to find a close reverse Proof die match to the OP’s coin.&nbsp; I found one that is reasonably similar and it is the middle image below. The top and bottom images illustrate how I came to my erroneous conclusion.&nbsp; I made a rooky mistake in not taking into consideration the resolution of the OP’s image.&nbsp; I was blinded by the rarity of a 1950-P RDV-001a.&nbsp; It took five years of research into Transitional Reverse Franklins for Dr. Wiles and ANACS to recognize and attribute the RDV-001a and RDV-001b varieties.&nbsp; To marginalize my own efforts by making such a sophomoric error is unacceptable to me. However, on the bright side, it has exposed the variety to fellow collectors who followed this post even if it was by mistake.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1116674[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>On a side note: [USER=75866]@Santinidollar[/USER] – You might want to check the obverse of your coin.&nbsp; The middle image of the reverse PCGS# 83616260 (verifiable with TrueView) is actually a QDO obverse which commands a healthy premium. Your obverse image resolution does not permit identification but IMO it is worth a second look.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=76792]@chascat[/USER] – If by “I&#039;m looking for the 58 MS trans. Rev….” you mean a Type 2 reverse, look on eBay.&nbsp; I have seen a few not identified as such and going for regular UNC prices.&nbsp; That is a real “Cherry Pick”.</p><p><br /></p><p>PS. Thank for the opportunity of redemption.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in