Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2364625, member: 19165&quot;]I agree that the 1812 was overgraded slightly. I like it better at 40. There needs to be some luster present for a 45 - and I don&#039;t see any at all. There is too much wear on the cheek and eagle for a 45, in my opinion. </p><p><br /></p><p>The 24 is more like what I would expect to see for a 45. It would be accurately graded at 45, but if there is a decent amount of luster present in hand, I could see an argument made for 50. It should not be any more than 50, from what I can see in the pictures. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t know that I would say &quot;heavily worn&quot; for the 1812 - but I would definitely say &quot;too heavily worn for a 45.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in