Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;7Jags, post: 3266341, member: 78719&quot;]No, I did not as you had none of contribution other than a rather poorly attempted &quot;brush back&quot;;&nbsp; and were full of accusation instead. I broached a fair subject by way of introduction of an example. There is no accusation, but rather a suggestion &amp; note your reaction to be rather severe and itself accusative in nature. I asked you a simple question to which you have not responded: have you seen the coin in question or not? You made a statement which would indicate you had and that I did not appreciate or know what I was looking at.</p><p><br /></p><p>Many of us have likely seen examples of coins where the subjective aspect of the grade has shown through, to put it mildly.</p><p><br /></p><p>What in the world are you doing even bringing up whistle blower laws in such a discussion or forum? Perhaps this is an area of concern on your part? Discussions related to grading subjectivity or difficulties in reproducibility are fair game.</p><p><br /></p><p>You may have some ax to grind, I was touching on a subject that has come up again - perhaps the tale of the Emperor&#039;s New Clothes ought to be brought up. Why would you take it to another level?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in