Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2771363, member: 19165&quot;]Well, I&#039;m a little bit late to this party, but I would have guessed 65.</p><p><br /></p><p>Strike: 66. I agree that this is a nice strike.</p><p>Luster: 65. Even in these glamour shots, the luster does not appear strong. It appears a bit flashy on the obverse, but the reverse looks to have a creamier type of luster, which does not get high grades.</p><p>Eye Appeal: 66. The toning is attractive, but the splotchy nature of the obverse toning brings it down some (the look is actually kinda weird, the more I look at it.... the top of the reverse appears original, but the bottom of the reverse and top of the obverse look like secondary toning after a dip.....) The second photos, just posted, also make it look hazy and spotty - flaws hidden in the usually-deceptive so-called &quot;tru&quot;-views. </p><p>Contact Marks: 65/67. The reverse is flawless. If the obverse matched, this would be an easy 66+ as you mention. However, the disturbances in the field in front of her face limit the grade, and that gash behind her head immediately disqualify this from 66. </p><p><br /></p><p>So, I agree with the 65 grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in