Key dates are, obviously, the toughest and most expensive dates in a particular series. A semi-key date is one that’s definitely rarer and/or more valuable than the common dates, but not necessarily at the top of the list of rarities for that particular series. In some series you might have maybe one or two key dates at the very top rung in terms of value, then behind those, two or three or however many semi-keys, and then all the rest. The terminology is rather loose, and eBay sellers abuse the heck out of it, often even referring to common dates as semi-keys. This is not the case. A semi-key must clearly rise above the rest in terms of value. Case in point: @Pickin and Grinin's 1944 Walking Liberty half is a common date. In MS65, according to Numismedia, it is a $119 coin. In MS65, also according to Numismedia, my 1938-D, a semi-key date, is worth $1,280. (PCGS says $1,600. I actually have $1,500 in it.) That's because of its basic scarcity due to the lower mintage. But it is not especially rare in Mint State. There are some earlier Walking Liberty halves that are common in lower grades but worth even more than my coin in MS65 because of their rarity in Mint State. (Those are condition rarities.)
I voted 64. These are significantly difficult to have a fully detailed leg on Liberty or the eagle. Luster looks great, but the field marks on the R in the obverse and the fact that all the lines are present, but legs are flat, I think they may have brought it down to a 64. Great coin though!
All of the low all-number slabs I have, do have the barcode 0-block: 75, 127, 761, 1422, 1424 7-block: 70195, 70395, 77384 15-block: 150420, 152357 (sharpied Sample), 155894, 158722 21-block: 215114 Our assumption is that they started using the all numeric when (Amos ownership) stopped the XX####, and they just filled in the blocks that weren't used for the conversions.
Thanks Burton, what gen is this then? I thought I read that the serial numbers without bar code went up to 300,000 or so with a few outliers around 250,000 or so. I thought I read something wrong. Comprehension isn't always my best suit.
You have it backwards... there is a block around 300,000 which doesn't have the bar code. But the defining characteristics of the change over from XX#### to all numeric is the type 1 bar code.
One thing I learned 20 something years ago was on the shopping network (Coin Channel) that never hit home until a couple of years ago. What was that guy's name? Rick? He could sell snowcones to Eskimos, but I digress. There is mint and year rarity and then there is conditional rarity. It's huge in the Morgan series. I never got that until I started collecting a set, wanting the best examples I could afford. The 1901 P is really starting to piss me off.
Found a 1903S it just has that look. I won't look at it. If it was an 04S I would have already pulled the trigger.
Both Cheech and Randy come from the era of wear is wear, I like it. I think that that is the kind of discretion one should have when buying. I certainly do.