GTG - 1974 S Eisenhower Dollar

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by phankins11, Sep 4, 2015.

Page 1 of 2
  1. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    Picked this up this week for a great price...what do you think the grade is?

    I'll post pics later....

    1974SIke-Silver-NGC-MS67-obverse.jpg
    1974SIke-Silver-NGC-MS67-reverse.jpg
     
    phankins11, Sep 4, 2015
    #1 + Quote Reply
    jay4202472000 and green18 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    67 assuming that scratch on the reverse is on the slab.
     
    rlm's cents, Sep 4, 2015
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    '66 if the scratches I see on the reverse side are on the slab.......
     
    green18, Sep 4, 2015
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones Well-Known Member

    66.
     
    Daniel Jones, Sep 4, 2015
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones Well-Known Member

    I should add I say 66 because I see just enough blemishes on the obverse to prevent giving it a 67
     
    Daniel Jones, Sep 4, 2015
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. miedbe7

    miedbe7 Wayward Collector

    yaaa ikes, 67 ftw
     
    miedbe7, Sep 4, 2015
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Wrong. 68.
     
    mlov43, Sep 4, 2015
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    66
     
    ldhair, Sep 4, 2015
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    If I were grading it, I'd start at MS67 and work my way down.
     
    19Lyds, Sep 4, 2015
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. Bill1517

    Bill1517 Active Member

    67
     
    Bill1517, Sep 4, 2015
    #10 + Quote Reply
  12. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    Lovely coin.
     
    onecenter, Sep 4, 2015
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    Drum roll.....


    FB_IMG_1441420435396.jpg
     
    phankins11, Sep 4, 2015
    #12 + Quote Reply
    swamp yankee, jay4202472000, green18 and 1 other person like this.
  14. Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones Well-Known Member

    I was wrong, I am man enough to admit it. Ha, ha! Then again, maybe I am just a better grader than NGC ha, ha! Then again, they had the better grading advantage.
     
    Daniel Jones, Sep 5, 2015
    #13 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 likes this.
  15. charlietig

    charlietig Well-Known Member

    Wow, very nice.
     
    charlietig, Sep 5, 2015
    #14 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 likes this.
  16. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I'm a little late to the party, but I was going to say 67.
     
    physics-fan3.14, Sep 5, 2015
    #15 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 likes this.
  17. Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones Well-Known Member

    Yeah, sure. Ha, ha!
     
    Daniel Jones, Sep 5, 2015
    #16 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 likes this.
  18. Dimedude2

    Dimedude2 Member

    a beautiful coin indeed, and yes I am the master of the obvious.
     
    Dimedude2, Sep 5, 2015
    #17 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 likes this.
  19. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Well, I'll be hornswagglered!
     
    mlov43, Sep 5, 2015
    #18 + Quote Reply
    phankins11 and Daniel Jones like this.
  20. Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones Well-Known Member

    The funny thing about it is paddyman recently posted a photo of a 1944 D 5 center in an NGC slab that certified it as a "1944 P". So, how can we really know for sure if they are accurate on this one? Ha, ha!
     
    Daniel Jones, Sep 5, 2015
    #19 + Quote Reply
  21. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    give it up Daniel, you got it wrong :D
     
    phankins11, Sep 5, 2015
    #20 + Quote Reply
    Daniel Jones likes this.
16 more messages...
Page 1 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page