GTG 1974-D Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Mar 16, 2020.

?

Guess the Assigned Grade

  1. MS63

  2. MS64

  3. MS65

  4. MS66

  5. MS67

  6. Other (Please Explain in Comments)

  7. Not Full Steps

  8. 5 Full Steps

  9. + Designation

  10. * Designation

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Please guess the grade of the 1974-D Jefferson Nickel shown below. I have attached a poll for you to cast your vote and you may select up to 4 different things: the numerical grade, Full Steps, + grade, and * designation.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Looks like S may be doubled on Reverse, so DDR for designation?
     
  4. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    What S are you seeing?
     
  5. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    upload_2020-3-16_13-21-25.png
    Looks like may be split a little through the center line with top tip separated as well?
     
    Islander80-83 likes this.
  6. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    Oh, okay. I can't see it cause it's much to small but I trust you.
     
  7. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Don't know that I would go that far :) just know he likes nickels that have a little something special either in extraordinary condition or in other attributes. Not an expert by any means so it could be nothing but MD or die wear.
     
    Islander80-83 likes this.
  8. Islander80-83

    Islander80-83 Well-Known Member

    You're singing my song! ;)
     
    USS656 likes this.
  9. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    MS63 Not FS.

    The jaw hit is massive, as well as the hit above Cents, numerous other lesser hits.

    Overall, I find this coin a bit odd looking, as compare to many of your other Nickels, I think it's the toning.
     
  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I went MS 64 and no full steps
    ...I could see a 65 from the TPGs but the big nick on the jaw and on the reverse through cents worries me
     
  11. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    I went 64 but forgot to check NFS.
     
  12. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    I clicked 66 by accident. :( I wanted to click 65, no FS.
     
  13. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    I can say that finding high grade 70's coinage during a CRH event is harder than finding higher grade 60's nickels. That's a nice looking specimen from the 70's. Too bad on the abrasions on the reverse especially with nearly full steps. Nice coin overall!!
     
  14. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd Supporter

    I voted MS64 not full steps. The hit on the jaw and above Cents keeps it from gem. Nice looking coin nonetheless.
     
    Kevin Mader likes this.
  15. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  16. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    MS 64 no steps.
     
  17. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Nobody got it right yet
     
  18. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

    I went 64 5FS. The jaw hit doesn't bother me as much (planchet flaw) as the two hits on the hairline and all the hits on the reverse.
     
  19. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    This coin reminds me of the "shovel scoop" coin which was a PCGS 1974 MS65FS with a very similar mark on the jawline.

    [​IMG]

    Regarding the steps, I don't have a huge problem with NGC calling the coin full steps because under a loupe the weakness in the photo isn't as pronounced and the steps do appear full.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2020
  20. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    This is a really good point. Jefferson Nickels from the 70's & 80's are not held to the same standard as early Jeffersons. Seems to me that what would be an MS65 from the early years would be an MS66 in most of the 60's, 70's, & 80's.

    For example, here is a Heritage photo of an 1974-D PCGS MS66 FS, the surfaces look pretty similar to me.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2020
    Kevin Mader likes this.
  21. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I voted 64FS. With the mark on the cheek and the numerous smaller marks on the rev, I don't see how it could be a 65, let alone 66. I did not know of the different standards, based on date, and find that really confusing.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page