GTG: 1964 Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Aug 5, 2020.

?

Grade me, please

  1. 64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 67

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  5. 68

    12 vote(s)
    60.0%
  6. 69

    7 vote(s)
    35.0%
  7. 70

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. +

    5 vote(s)
    25.0%
  9. Other special designation

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, go for it. Coin looks just like the Truview 998F7695-9695-4622-BCED-7BDFEAAD6952.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Wow, a real beauty. PR68? I will admit that Jefferson's are not my strong suit.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  4. Inspector43

    Inspector43 72 Year Collector

    I am not good at the numerical grades. I am good at eye appeal and this one grades AWESOME.
     
    Morgandude11 and Mike Davis like this.
  5. Bluntflame

    Bluntflame Active Member

    I am thinking PR69. The strike is absolutely perfect, and the condition is immaculate. The only possible issue I see would be the MD at the base of the Monticello building.
     
  6. JCKTJK

    JCKTJK Active Member

    PR 68, maybe FS?
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector Supporter

    Definitely NOT a business strike.
    The Mint struck so many nickels for business use in 1964 that in general the MS coins grade 63 or 64.
    It was quantity over quality.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  8. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector Supporter

    I don't think Proof coins are eligible for FS; they are expected to be FS.
     
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    An attractive PR 68
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  11. Mike Davis

    Mike Davis Supporter! Supporter

    Pr69. Very nice.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  12. Sidney Osborne

    Sidney Osborne Active Member

    Nice coin, toning is not overstated...almost looks more like a satin finish....
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  13. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    PR67+ nice toning
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Supporter! Supporter

    I voted 69
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  15. JeffC

    JeffC Collecting for the fun of it. Supporter

    If I learn just one thing at CT per day, this would be today's thing. Wonder why no one guessed PR70. (Asking out of ignorance not contention.)
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  16. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Supporter! Supporter

    It looks dang near perfect. But PCGS has only graded 7 as PF70 with a value of $625. Almost 600 as PF69 at a fraction of that price.
     
    Morgandude11 and JeffC like this.
  17. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  18. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    For this date that grade isn't common. Plus, there are very few known toners graded PR 70 (I saw only one within the last year).
     
    Morgandude11 and JeffC like this.
  20. JCKTJK

    JCKTJK Active Member

    thanks, makes sense.
     
    Morgandude11 and Santinidollar like this.
  21. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page