GTG - 1961 Jefferson Nickel Toner

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by CircCam, Mar 31, 2019.

  1. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    What did NGC say?

    4FDC46FF-BE95-420B-A939-D69A8DFD2CBB.jpeg 4B9D86D2-035D-432E-B606-F86F38C841DA.jpeg 9BDE8FC1-AA65-4346-AB7D-86913E542953.png
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2019
    ddddd and Randy Abercrombie like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Bonus: What would you all grade this one? It’s raw but electric blue with flashy luster.

    7F3F2A17-4A4A-4CB7-82B7-001B246AB431.jpeg
    @RonSanderson @Lehigh96
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2019
    ddddd and alurid like this.
  4. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    I’m still learning from @Lehigh96, so let’s see if my suggestion of MS65 holds up. No matter what I say, this coin is a delight.


    Edit: I missed the first post, which I think is a 66. I’m going to look at the population reports because these really thin out in these grades.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2019
    CircCam likes this.
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    66 and 65
     
    CircCam likes this.
  6. MeowtheKitty

    MeowtheKitty Well-Known Member

    Did you get it to tone by heating on the range? Because in the picture it looks like you had just finished doing it.
     
  7. MeowtheKitty

    MeowtheKitty Well-Known Member

    Meow's guess would be AT because of the range work. Or if it did straight grade, a MS64.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  8. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    I’ll say 66. There is a good amount of roughness at the center of either side. That appears to just be planchette roughness that was not removed due to the strike.
    The roughness at the bottom of the obverse concerns me a bit though.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  9. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    MS-65 and 64
     
    CircCam likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  11. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I'm at MS-66 with a shot at 66+ on the first one. The second I see as a 65.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  12. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    No, I just like the lighting in that spot. No frying Jefferson nickels with my scrambled eggs here.
     
    RonSanderson likes this.
  13. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 65+ on the one that went to NGC

    The other looks lower; I'd call it MS 64.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  14. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    MS66+
    &
    MS65
     
    CircCam likes this.
  15. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    MS66

    B4058BF5-819D-4540-9B27-F77A7979408C.jpeg

    Wish I had a crystal ball to see what conditions caused that toning...

    It was nice to see that NGC liked it, particularly as they were tough on some other coins in that submission.
     
  16. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I liked this coin more than NGC. I remember when you first showed this coin, I thought it had a decent shot at MS67. Only the new photo of you holding the coin made me drop that down to MS66+. The coin is beautiful, lustrous, and extremely well struck. Three things you don’t see from 1961 Jefferson Nickels.
     
    ldhair, CircCam and RonSanderson like this.
  17. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It is pretty. I like it as well.
     
    CircCam likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page