Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 4913168, member: 19165&quot;]This is something PCGS and I disagree on... I&#039;ll accept planchet flaws on a 65. In my opinion, they had better be almost indistinguishable on a 66, and I absolutely cannot accept them on a 67. Remnant planchet flaws are a function of strike - as the grade gets higher, the strike must be more perfect. At 66 or above, the strike needs to be just about perfect. </p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS, however, allows them in alarming quantities even on a 67.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is the reason that, in my post above, I say that I grade this coin 65+ but I&#039;m guessing PCGS called it 66. (I really hope they didn&#039;t grade this one 67....)</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m actually interested to hear [USER=24314]@Insider[/USER] &#039;s opinion on remnant planchet flaws. I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve ever heard him discuss them.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in