If this beast gets a toning bump on its grade, I may vomit. Looks like I already may have. For me, it's a 64. In this toning obsessed world, maybe a 72.
Well to all of you whom guessed an MS -66 you're correct! To those of you whom vomited I hope you're wearing a hat today. and have not had pea soup for lunch.
Not a coin I personally would care to have, but that's me. To all the toning bugs who wanted me to show them a coin with unattractive brown toning that got a grade bump, TA DA, here it is.
Just didnt see good detail on reverse but if NGC says it is a MS-66....It was interesting though thanks Paddy54!
I would never turn down beautiful, even toning. But, brown, black or an artificial looking isn't pleasing to me. Bright white is most desired.. to a very pale golden.
Blast white can be so boring on older coins and usually means a dipped coin especially on 19th century coins and even a lot of early 20th century . I for one am more obsessed with original skinned coins which are getting harder to find especially for Bust halves .
Agreed, no quarrel, but 1953?!?!? Jeez, I have coins in my collection that I KNOW are untouched since 1964 and they don't show that brown crap. Blast white in 1953 coins strikes me as "normal". I guess we have to consider this dime an "early adopter" or precocious youngster.
I'm thinking this one may have come from a mint set , or somewhere where the paper was in contact . It's different to say the least .
I've seen double mint set coins and have a few sets. This doesn't look the same to me, but that can also be local conditions dependent.