GTG-1945 S nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by potty dollar 1878, Aug 5, 2021.

  1. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Don't you hate it when the dealers [or auction houses] put their stupid stickers on the back & destroy part of the label.

    They should know better.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  4. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    Yeah I was pissed my new 1899 morgan came with a sticker completely covering the back label.. fortunately it came off cleanly but they not alway so nice...
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    You are lucky, I've had a few that destroyed the label
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  6. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  7. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

    Here are the pic's
     

    Attached Files:

    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  8. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I like the coin but it appears that it has been in a poor environment. Along with the older slab which were not, shall I say, exactly air tight. I would put it in a safer location, leave it alone, and enjoy what you have. Thanks for posting it.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  9. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Just a bump good guesses so far.
     
  10. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I also hate what stickers did to the back of the old holders but, I don't think the dealers were aware of the problem until it was to late. I have a few with the same problem. One thing I learned the hard way was to remove any auction stickers as soon as possible. If you don't the glue from the sticker could transfer to the slab and be a real pain to remove.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  11. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I suspect the nickels in the War Nickel set reacted to the holder.
     
  12. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

    64 with ugly toning on the obverse, but then I'm not a fan of toning. Others may see it as beautiful.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  13. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

    Yes. sadly true. Now in 2x2's they still grade into mid MS condition.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Almost certainly. Those early Fatty holders did some awful things to surfaces of many really nice coins.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  15. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  16. 1865King

    1865King Well-Known Member

    I'm not shocked but, I bet the coin looked different when it was first slabbed. Honestly it's hard to tell if a coin will change over time in the slab. If a coin looks good in an old slab it most likely won't change over time. The environment the coins are stored in is extremely important.
     
    chascat and potty dollar 1878 like this.
  17. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I had this coin at MS67 in the other threads, and while it is possible that this coin turned in the holder, my guess is that it was graded like this. NGC loved crusty war nickels with ultra clean surfaces back in the "old fatty" days in the 90's.
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  18. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Your post made me go back and look at mine. No toning on them yet.
    1945 S Jefferson Nickel, MS66.jpg
    1945 S Jefferson, MS66.jpg 1945 S Jefferson NGC MS66 rev.jpg
    1945 S Jefferson Nickel, MS66 rev.jpg
     
    1865King and potty dollar 1878 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page