GTG 1941-D Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:41 PM.

?

Please guess the assigned grade

  1. MS64

  2. MS65

  3. MS66

  4. MS67

  5. MS68

  6. Other (please explain in comments)

  7. FS (5 Full Steps)

  8. + grade

  9. * designation

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Please guess the grade of the 1941-D Jefferson Nickel shown below. I have attached a poll for you to cast your vote and you may select up to 4 different things: the numerical grade, Full Steps, + grade, and * designation. Now it is obvious that the coin is housed in a PCGS holder so it can't have the star designation, but please consider that I may cross this coin to NGC, so your vote with respect to the * designation would be whether or not you think the coin would get a star from NGC in the future. Please vote for your grade before scrolling down to read the responses as they may influence your decision.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome!
     
    CircCam and tibor like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. tibor

    tibor Well-Known Member

    I'll guess 65 with 5 steps. I like the suttle toning.
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Likely PCGS grade: MS-67.

    The luster appears quite strong, and the eye appeal is obviously quite attractive. There is some planchet roughness on his cheek, and there are a few noticeable contact marks in his hair. There don't appear to be many marks worth mentioning on the reverse.

    Also, this clearly does not appear to have 6FS. I think these steps are above average, and might just barely qualify for 5FS.
     
  5. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza New Member

  6. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Professional Teenager

    Would this coin warrant a star designation by NGC?
     
  7. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Not in my opinion, no. The Star should be for exceptional eye appeal. It has fairly average eye appeal for a 67. It is attractive and lustrous, but the toning is mostly generic gold with some subtle highlights. This is not Star quality.
     
  8. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  10. Legomaster1

    Legomaster1 Cointalk Patron

    MS 67, with 5 full steps. Nice toning as well.
     
  11. GSDykes

    GSDykes Well-Known Member

    MS 65, bottom step merged. Reverse somewhat soft-appearing strike. Nice luster.
     
  12. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd

    I put MS64+. A really nice coin but, I feel, it's another one that didn't quite pass muster to the gem grade.
     
  13. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    67FS. Beautiful coin
     
  14. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random nobody...

    It is close to 67. I will say 66+ 5FS
     
  15. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy Supporter

  16. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 66 FS....looks clean and appealing (but not star worthy in my opinion)
     
  17. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

    MS67 no full steps because of the mark across steps 4 and 5 between pillars 2 and 3. No star because of the late die stages and the orange peel effect.

    Nice coin!
     
  18. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I bought this coin as part of a 10 coin set which equated to about $20 per coin. To my eyes, the coin is certainly 5FS and has a decent shot at upgrading to MS67 if I submit to NGC. The luster and eye appeal are much better than my photos show.

    [​IMG]

    It really surprises me that PCGS didn't grade this coin FS.
     
    furham likes this.
  19. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy Supporter

    If anybody would PCGS would. I think it deserves it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page