Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 8121813, member: 37839&quot;]66 5 FS.&nbsp; The coin is very clean in terms of absence of nicks.&nbsp; It has appealing tone on the obverse.&nbsp; The strike is weak, from dies that look badly worn—that makes&nbsp; the Monticello building look rather weak.&nbsp; The reverse die looks like it had greater wear than the obverse.&nbsp; That makes me wonder if the dies were misaligned in terms of pressure.&nbsp; Luster is kind of muted for a gem MS coin.&nbsp; I would have said 65 FS from the muted luster, but think the surface preservation carries the ball over the 66 line.&nbsp; Interesting coin, as it is clean, but not snappy, nor does it scream out with luster, yet it has clean surfaces.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in