Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3829765, member: 19165&quot;]Well, let me put it like this: </p><p><br /></p><p>In the old ANACS white holder, it has the intrigue of being in an old holder. Let&#039;s assume NGC price guide is accurate: </p><p><br /></p><p>64 5FS is listed at $40. This is what the slab says.</p><p>65 no-FS is listed at $42. This is what I say it is. </p><p>65 5FS is listed at $55, and you claim that PCGS will probably grant it that (which absolutely reduces the credibility of the already-worthless PCGS so-called strike designations....)</p><p>Even at 66 5FS (the equivalent of 66FS at PCGS, and the upper max of what you think it might get), NGC lists this at $81. </p><p><br /></p><p>To submit, you&#039;re going to pay $30 minimum in fees and shipping. </p><p><br /></p><p>I see absolutely no reason to submit this coin to either service, because in the *absolute best case scenario* the anticipated upgrade is not even close to being worth it. </p><p><br /></p><p>I certainly wouldn&#039;t crack it, because raw it is worth $5-$10. The old ANACS slab is worth more than that! </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;d sell this piece as is....</p><p><br /></p><p>Unless, in typical Lehigh fashion, there&#039;s something more about the coin you haven&#039;t revealed to us. This is so far below your normal range/grade/strike/value that I have to suspect there&#039;s a trick <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in