GTG: 1935-S Peace dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Jul 26, 2021.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Graded by PCGS

    7211575D-934F-4316-8D49-F5CC25D7A09B.jpeg 956625F1-CF44-4A80-B9CA-D4B9B4E1A6CB.jpeg
     
    Mr.Q and ddddd like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Matthew Kruse

    Matthew Kruse Young Numismatist

  4. Jim-P

    Jim-P Supporter! Supporter

    I guess MS63, too. I want to go higher but the obverse close-up has me wondering. Anxious to see what PCGS said.
     
  5. QuintupleSovereign

    QuintupleSovereign Well-Known Member

  6. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

    MS-63 OR 64 ?
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect for 65 years Supporter

    I would say MS63 as well but what do I know.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  8. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    If they are mostly luster breaks and not marks on the face I will go MS 65
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  10. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x -1883 O nut

  11. HAB Peace 28 2.0

    HAB Peace 28 2.0 Jusqu’ici tout va bien Supporter

  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    63, as that date gets market graded, but I would have graded it as 62, because of the obverse contact marks. Nice coin.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  13. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

  14. thejaxcollector

    thejaxcollector Active Member

    obverse scratches on holder, not coin......64
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  15. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

  16. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 62
    ...given it's a better date and there are plenty of marks/hits (especially on the face), I'm going conservative
     
    Santinidollar and Morgandude11 like this.
  17. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

  18. Millard

    Millard Coindog

    I hope you got a 64 or better. Looks to me like some of the "junk" may be on the slab, not on the coin.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  19. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

  20. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    62 as well

    almost went 63 because of the luster, but just too many distracting marks
     
    Santinidollar and Morgandude11 like this.
  21. psuman08

    psuman08 New Member

    63 because of the luster
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page