Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 7339097, member: 37839&quot;]This coin is bewildering.&nbsp; It has MS surfaces in terms of wear.&nbsp; The strike is typical for the date—below average.&nbsp; If you find a well-struck 1934s, good luck on that—you just found a $5,000 coin.&nbsp; Luster is definitely somewhat dulled, obviously from overdipping.&nbsp; If I were grading it, I would have gone either AU 58 for muted luster, as there is no wear, or MS 61, as there is no wear.&nbsp; Here is what NGC decided, and I get their logc.&nbsp; The luster brings the grade down, but not enough to called it a details coin.&nbsp;&nbsp; I think they went a bit too low, as I said, I would probably have gone AU 58, due to sharply escalating prices in MS condition.&nbsp; I still like it a lot, as it is a decent example of a key date.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1281049[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in