Something about the photo made me think cleaned and I see wear, so I'm guessing AU Details - Cleaned (it could just be my interpretation of the photo though)
I'm changing my guess to AU55. However, I peeked. I agree with the grade b/c of the obvious wear on the reverse.
This would've been more interesting if you blacked out the certification #on your first post. Now I'll never know who cheated but I'm guessing everyone who said MS didn't. LOL
I never cheat and I always tell the truth. But seriously, I blew this GTG by a megaton when I said 65.
Only those who cheat would know the point of doing so. But what I posted wasn't meant to be taken so seriously.
I cheated once in college, as I recall. It was in Music Appreciation, and the professor said he would allow "one free cheat." Well, I took mine, changed two answers, and made an A in the course!
Very nice, I also guessed AU58, we (my son and me) have an SLQ collection, our 1925 is an EF40, so not as nice as yours, I have observed that SLQs are frequently graded harshly without account for the common weak strikes which can be a bit frustrating. They are among my very favorite coins.