Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 4310496, member: 73489&quot;]You think it&#039;s only overgraded by 1/2 number ?&nbsp; 66+ ?</p><p><br /></p><p>It could look better in hand, but alot of good graders here took a look and I think the highest was MS65+.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #0000ff">A 67 should look pretty pristine. </span></b> We can&#039;t ascertain if the 2 obverse fields are &quot;dirty&quot; or if it&#039;s bad photography, but you do have 2 noticeable gashes on that side and then lots of dings on the reverese.&nbsp; So you can&#039;t even say it&#039;s a 67 based on a 65 or 66 obverse and a strong 67 or more on the reverse.&nbsp; Neither side looks 67.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #0000ff">I&#039;m really waiting to see what the auction brings for this coin. </span></b> It&#039;s one thing to pay MS65 money for an MS63 coin, it&#039;s a few hundred bucks more.&nbsp; But anybody buying this is going to be paying 5-figures so it&#039;s serious $$$...and presumably they know how to grade Saints.&nbsp; So if they are buying the coin and not the slab.......</p><p><br /></p><p>Again, even if the 2 obverse fields are clear (unlike in the photo), the 2 obverse gashes and all the little dings on the reverse to me make this no way an MS67.</p><p><br /></p><p>Again, JMHO. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in