Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 4305114, member: 73489&quot;]<b>I compared the 1924 MS67 to my 1923-D MS66 and my 1924 MS65.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>(1)&nbsp; I can&#039;t compare the luster from the photos to mine (good luster) because you can&#039;t see luster in most photos, and I can&#039;t tell if the luster/fields are clear and the &quot;clouds&quot; in the 2 fields are just that.&nbsp; So assuming it&#039;s not visible to the naked eye and more a photographic artifact,<b> I thought my MS66 was cleaner with a better reverse and 1 less noticeable gash on the obverse than the MS67.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>(2)&nbsp; Comparing the same coins -- 1924 -- but my 2-grades lower MS65, I had lots of bag marks in the 2 fields.&nbsp; But even assuming there is nothing to the &quot;clouds&quot; on the MS67 1924, the obverse hits were deeper and lots of reverse bagmarks on the MS67 and dings lead me very confused.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #0000ff">Even an MS66 for the 1924 seems very generous. </span></b> If I were rich and the coin didn&#039;t go for what I thought it will as an MS67...I&#039;d buy it....then bring it to FUN next January, take it to the PCGS tables with the label taped-over, and then ask them to grade that one and my MS65.</p><p><br /></p><p>Would have proved interesting to say the least !<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in