GTG: 1924 Saint-Gaudens

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by GoldFinger1969, Mar 29, 2020.

  1. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    No cheating :D....lots of ways to interpret this coin....I'll reveal the grade tomorrow (Monday the 30th).

    1924 GTG obverse.jpg
    1924 GTG reverse.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 64
    ...nice look overall; some hits in focal areas (but these seem to be more acceptable on gold coins from what I have seen)
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    MS-65. Very nice appeal.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    I’ll go 63 or 64
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  6. TexAg

    TexAg Well-Known Member

    MS64 - Beautiful coin!
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  7. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Like the colors . . . MS65.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  8. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  9. Mainebill

    Mainebill Wild Bill

  10. hotwheelsearl

    hotwheelsearl Well-Known Member

    63 due to the major hits on the front and back
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  11. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    I'll give the grade tonight sometime after 8 PM.....I think it's going to spur ALOT of discussion. :D
     
    David Betts and ddddd like this.
  12. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    This makes me think I'm multiple points off. :eek::p
     
    GoldFinger1969 and -jeffB like this.
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes? Supporter

    I like it at 64, but I wouldn't be surprised by 65.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I already humiliated myself on the last double-eagle GTG. I'm just going to stay in the audience for this one. :p
     
    David Betts and GoldFinger1969 like this.
  15. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Hey, you've got to be IN IT to WIN IT !!! :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2020
  16. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd

    I'm in the 64 camp
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  17. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I can't grade these things. I'll go with 62.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  18. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes? Supporter

    The hard part with these pictures is I have *absolutely* no idea what the luster is like, and that plays a big part of the grade.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  19. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    Unc details....environmental damage /exposure to heat.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  20. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Is the best way to determine luster to look at the coin under light and angle it different ways, PF ?
     
  21. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I can understand why you are saying that but the fact that the photo is a Heritage glamour shot leads me to believe its graded at least MS65. Those colors are unusual for gold but not so crazy that I would think heat was applied.
     
    Rheingold and GoldFinger1969 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page